Exaggerations and Caveats in Press Releases and Health-Related Science News
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Exaggerated or simplistic news is often blamed for adversely influencing public health. However, recent findings suggested many exaggerations were already present in university press releases, which scientists approve. Surprisingly, these exaggerations were not associated with more news coverage. Here we test whether these two controversial results also arise in press releases from prominent science and medical journals. We then investigate the influence of mitigating caveats in press releases, to test assumptions that caveats harm news interest or are ignored. METHODS AND FINDINGS Using quantitative content analysis, we analyzed press releases (N = 534) on biomedical and health-related science issued by leading peer-reviewed journals. We similarly analysed the associated peer-reviewed papers (N = 534) and news stories (N = 582). Main outcome measures were advice to readers and causal statements drawn from correlational research. Exaggerations in press releases predicted exaggerations in news (odds ratios 2.4 and 10.9, 95% CIs 1.3 to 4.5 and 3.9 to 30.1) but were not associated with increased news coverage, consistent with previous findings. Combining datasets from universities and journals (996 press releases, 1250 news), we found that when caveats appeared in press releases there was no reduction in journalistic uptake, but there was a clear increase in caveats in news (odds ratios 9.6 and 9.5 for caveats for advice and causal claims, CIs 4.1 to 24.3 and 6.0 to 15.2). The main study limitation is its retrospective correlational nature. CONCLUSIONS For health and science news directly inspired by press releases, the main source of both exaggerations and caveats appears to be the press release itself. However we find no evidence that exaggerations increase, or caveats decrease, the likelihood of news coverage. These findings should be encouraging for press officers and scientists who wish to minimise exaggeration and include caveats in their press releases.
منابع مشابه
The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study
OBJECTIVE To identify the source (press releases or news) of distortions, exaggerations, or changes to the main conclusions drawn from research that could potentially influence a reader's health related behaviour. DESIGN Retrospective quantitative content analysis. SETTING Journal articles, press releases, and related news, with accompanying simulations. SAMPLE Press releases (n = 462) on...
متن کاملReflection of Knowledge and Information Science’s News in the Press: A Case Study of Iran Newspaper
Background and Aim: The present study aims to explore the coverage and reflection of Knowledge and Information Science news in the Iranian press. Iran Newspaper which is one of the main public newspapers in the country has been selected as the case for this study. Method: This study used content analysis as its research methodology and adopted an inductive approach in data analysis. All the pag...
متن کاملCommunicating Science: Press Releases at EHP
As a service to our contributors and the public, EHP issues occasional press releases to publicize papers that we believe are relevant and important to researchers, educators, public health practitioners, policy makers, and/or the general public, as well as to regular EHP readers and contributors. Specifically, our goal is for EHP press releases to serve science and the public by increasing awa...
متن کاملJournals should lead the way in improving medical press releases.
News stories about medical research influence patients’ beliefs, behaviours and use of healthcare services. Yet the quality of news coverage of medical studies is often poor. 3 Many news stories about medical research exaggerate the clinical significance of the findings, fail to report potential harms of new interventions or overlook important study limitations. While it is tempting to blame jo...
متن کاملNothing but the truth
Everything gives you cancer, at least if you believe what you read in the news or see on TV. Fortunately, every thing also cures cancer, from red wine to silver nanoparticles. Of course the truth lies somewhere in between, and scientists might point out that these claims are at worst dangerous sensationalism and at best misjudged journalism. These kinds of media story, which inflate the risks a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 11 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016